American Psychology-Law Society logo

American Psychology-Law Society AI policy

Varies by programChecked November 9, 2026

In short

For the Grants-in-Aid for Graduate Students, using AI tools to generate the written proposal is treated as plagiarism. Applicants unsure whether a tool complies should contact the committee chair.

For applicants

  • For the Grants-in-Aid for Graduate Students, using AI tools to generate the written grant proposal will be considered plagiarism; the proposal should reflect the applicant's own work and thinking.[1]
  • Applicants unsure whether the programs they use comply with the grant's AI policy should contact the committee chair.[1]

Sources

  1. [1]
    Grants-in-Aid for Graduate Students

    American Psychology-Law Society

    “The use of AI tools to generate the written grant proposal will be considered plagiarism. This grant is expected to reflect your own work and thinking. If you are uncertain whether the programs you are utilizing comply with the AI policy of the grant, please contact committee chair.”

This page summarizes published guidance and is not legal advice. Policies change, and a specific solicitation can add its own rules, so confirm against the funding announcement before you apply. See every funder's AI policy.

Get started

Unlock AI built for research development

Atom reads each solicitation and the funder's rules, including its AI policy, and builds a compliance guide for every proposal.