Great Lakes Fishery Commission logo

Great Lakes Fishery Commission AI policy

Reviewer rules onlyChecked November 9, 2026

In short

The Great Lakes Fishery Commission says AI, large language models, and other generative AI technologies cannot and should not be used by peer reviewers of research proposals, because doing so violates confidentiality. No guidance for applicants was found.

For reviewers

  • AI, large language models, and other generative AI technologies cannot and should not be used by reviewers in the peer-review process. The commission says using them violates the confidentiality of review.[1]

Sources

  1. [1]
    instructions to peer reviewers

    Great Lakes Fishery Commission, January 1, 2025

    “the commission’s position is that AI, large-language models, and other generative AI technologies cannot and should not be used by reviewers in the peer-review process. Reviewers are trusted to maintain confidentiality and to ensure the reviewed work is not shared or used outside the peer-review process. Using AI or similar technologies violates the confidentiality process”

This page summarizes published guidance and is not legal advice. Policies change, and a specific solicitation can add its own rules, so confirm against the funding announcement before you apply. See every funder's AI policy.

Get started

Unlock AI built for research development

Atom reads each solicitation and the funder's rules, including its AI policy, and builds a compliance guide for every proposal.