June 23, 2026
Insights from NCURA
At the recent NCURA (National Council of University Research Administrators) conference, Tomer, co-founder of Atom Grants, and Kim from Denver Health (DHHA), took the stage to discuss the transformative role of AI in research and research administration.
Far from a dystopian narrative about automation replacing jobs, their message was clear and optimistic: AI is the next great scientific instrument, an extension of the human mind much like the telescope or microscope were extensions of our vision.
Here is a recap of their insightful session on how the research community is adapting to AI as a new creative partner.

Tom kicked off the session by framing AI's historical context. Scientific revolutions always begin with new tools. While telescopes helped us see further into the cosmos and microscopes revealed the cellular world, AI gives us a "sixth sense" for pattern recognition and prediction.
We can already witness this in groundbreaking discoveries:

Beyond massive discoveries, AI is changing daily research workflows through semantic search. Traditional keyword searches often return irrelevant results because they lack contextual understanding (e.g., searching for "chemistry" returns everything from physical to biological chemistry).
Semantic search uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to convert language into multi-dimensional vectors based on underlying meaning. This allows tools like ATOM Grants, Semantic Scholar, and Rabbit to act as creative partners, connecting researchers with hyper-relevant funding opportunities and interdisciplinary collaborators they might not have found otherwise.
AI is also being used to evaluate research quality intrinsically. Tools like scite are analyzing citations to determine whether they support, refute, or simply mention a paper, bringing vital nuance to institutional rankings and impact factors.
Kim shared the practical, on-the-ground realities of implementing AI at Denver Health, a safety-net hospital with limited resources and high case volumes. To help their lean team manage the entire grant lifecycle, DHHA is exploring several AI applications:

Kim emphasized a crucial point for administrators: AI is not replacing jobs. It’s a tool to streamline tedious tasks—like reading 20-page RFPs just to check eligibility—freeing up staff for more strategic, high-level work.
In a clinical setting, data security is paramount. Open-source AI isn't always an option due to HIPAA and IP concerns. Institutions need to establish AI governance committees, set strict guardrails, and extensively test internal models to prevent data breaches and mitigate hallucinations (such as an internal AI inventing fake contact emails!).
The golden rule remains: Trust, but verify. AI doesn't understand the nuanced "gray areas" of grant guidelines the way experienced administrators do.
Looking forward, Tom detailed the three archetypes of AI integration in science:
The Copilot: Augmenting current work by handling the "grind" (similar to how AI auto-completes code for developers today), allowing researchers to focus on insights.
The Oracle: AI that orchestrates its own sub-agents to achieve a broad goal, moving significantly faster than manual execution. [Image Prompt: A sleek, futuristic autonomous laboratory where an advanced robotic arm carefully handles beakers, overseen by a glowing AI holographic interface displaying real-time chemical data feedback.]
The Actuator: The "sci-fi" future that is already arriving. Autonomous, closed-loop labs (like those built by Periodic Labs) where AI reasons, proposes experiments, physical robots execute them, and the resulting data feeds back into the model in real time.
As researchers increasingly turn to ChatGPT to draft proposals, federal sponsors are drawing lines in the sand. For instance, the NIH has restricted the number of applications a PI can submit annually after instances of AI-generated spam, and the NSF mandates that AI can assist but cannot be the primary author of specific aims.
The rule of thumb? If you wouldn't trust a grad student to do it completely unsupervised, don't trust ChatGPT to do it either.
Platforms like ATOM are navigating these rules by using AI not to write the grants, but to extract requirements, generate cheat sheets, and provide automated "red-teaming" for instant proposal feedback.
As Andy Clark noted, “Just as a prosthetic limb can become part of our body, technology can become part of our minds.” AI does not dictate which scientific questions matter—that remains the crucial, creative job of humans. By adopting AI responsibly, the research community is poised to enter one of its most collaborative and productive eras yet.